Paulette. Due to the brevity of your message it is unclear to me whether it was directed at everyone in general (in which case I agree with it, though it could have been more helpfully formulated) or to me directly, in which case I think you are being a bit unfair really.
I did read the Mark Simon article, and I was worried by what he was writing because it would entail a lot of hazzle and confusion for artists who just want to follow their dreams and create. However, I was also very surprised that he did not link me to any relevant government sources on this bill that has him so greatly disturbed. Therefore I went out to "get informed" as you say, and I found many forums where this was discussed and I also saw several people cautioning against creating a panic. I thought that this was very sensible advice. They didn't say, and neither do I, that you should ignore these news, but that we should all take a step back and a deep breath and look at what was being said.
To that end, I found the blog I linked before (
six misconceptions about orphaned works) very helpful - she supports her claims with links and quotes of direct sources and not second-hand as is the case with Mark Simon. Here is another page where there is a very clear and informative debate in the art and comments:
Mercuralis at dA Especially the comments by Mercuralis herself, and Whitefantom. Instead of reading only Mark Simon, it is helpful to go to his primary source which is
IllustratedPartnership , that he links to himself at the end of his article, as you also mention above. Their approach is more nuanced and fact-supported, but essentially amounts to the same reaction as Mr Simon, only without the panic-inducement.
I am not trying to sway anyone to one side or the other. I simply thought it would be helpful to get both sides of the story, and I provided a link that I had found in my searches so that others could benefit from it as well.
All the best,