What one needs (speaking from my experience elsewhere) from Mods/Admins is for them to be a steady hand on the rudder. They don't necessarily need to be very active, but to have good steady even-handed judgement - also, I think most members who haven't been Mods/Admins often have little insight into how much work can be involved behind the scenes. If they are good teachers and community leaders too, then that's the icing on the cake, but they shouldn't be antagonistic to members who show initiative.
QUOTE (ElenaM)
I guess Dave is partially right about the fact people don't want to bother with the responsability of iniatiating a thread that can drawn criticism and dissatifaction. I say partially because it can be done if one is brave to take the responsability and is a born giver.
One needs not to be too thin-skinned, its true. It can feel like a very thankless task to have put a lot of time and effort into organising something, only to have it criticised (and, in an ill-informed way) by someone else who's never contributed anything of any note themselves. On the other hand, usually if one is knowledgable about something and shares the information, others are grateful, both people actively participating and those just reading along.
QUOTE (ElenaM)
people with an interest in teaching and love for their skill are more likely to drop by and give a handful of tips
It can also be more productive to answer specific problems people are having - they can then see the relevance of the points being made, whereas the same info presented as a tutorial might seem too "dry" and "academic". The downside to presenting general-concept material in this way is that it gets buried in the middle of a thread, and possibly effectively lost, as a resource.
On the two sites I admin, I set up a wiki linked to the forums on each of them, in the hope that this would allow us to accumulate informative posts, and get people to write articles, but again, the level of involvement has been low.
QUOTE (colnago)
Would a live chat room help any, allowing people to discuss topics in real time?
ConceptArt, another large site, has text-chat and audio-chat facilities - but my experience is that they are used by a small subset of those already active on the forums, and mostly for general chat/gossip, rather than discussion of art.
QUOTE
What the site and the administrators can do is to encourage iniatiative for monthly/seasonal activities but this requires from the people in charge to live the life of forums not just manage it.Aren't we asking too much?
Yes, possibly - and another problem is that if one leads too much, that is seen as setting an agenda - for example, I'm interested in traditional representational art, I have little interest in abstraction - but I'm happy for others to post abstract work - I'm not against it, I'm just not much interested in it - but if I'm an admin, and I write about what interests me, that sets an agenda, possibly abstract artists don't feel welcome?
QUOTE (colnago)
The people who are interested in participating will do so anyway, I guess you can't push a piece of string.
This is very true.
I don't have a good answer to this problem of participation levels, I wish I did.
Dave