I've been out of the loop for a LONG time, but I missed drawspace and you wonderful artists so I couldn't stay away. I'm back in college (after 10 years away)...and I'm an ART major!
Okay...question. I'm in Art 101 (beginning drawing, line, form...etc) and there are a few artists in my class who can bang out a sketch in like 15 minutes or less...and they've captured an image but not a likeness...The professor was having us sketch a star lily and she kept shortening the time allotted. Well, there's a guy next to me who can bang out these sketches but he's capturing a flower...it looks good, but it only remotely resembles the flower we were trying to draw. Now I'm in favor of the 'sight-size' school of thought when it comes to drawing. But maybe my drawings are just more illustrative and his are more painterly? I'm confused because he keeps getting great compliments when the professor comes by us, but she's not giving me direction. My drawings look like the flower (they'd look better if I had more time to finish)...whereas his are finished but aren't really a 'life-drawing'.
Advice?
Am I making a molehill into Mt. Everest?
Thanks!
Adam
