QUOTE (paulette4 @ Apr 17 2009, 10:40 PM)

Ha, your well above my knowledge level for photography!
The only thing I could add, is that I take my pictures in side, but right at my patio door, which is pointing NW.
For me it is better than inside with lights and better than outdoors in the sun.
I have a point and shoot and use the macro, I don't know if that tells you anything.... probably not as your pictures look better than mine.
A quick Google on photographing art gives back many results.
Thanks Paulette .. I've spoken with a number of pros about it including B&H about lighting and technique. Unfortunately I think the problem lies mostly in me ... I have the wrong gift. I can take a perfectly good camera in a perfectly good setting and create a horrible photo. That's a gift too, isn't it?
I did discover a couple things last week that helped. I used the umbrellas with those 500W Tungsten lamps which diffused the light so there were no hot spots on the paper. I shot the image raw but overexposed it 1 stop according to the meter. Then I used Lightroom to adjust the exposure back a little and finished with some sharpening and tonal adjustments in Photoshop. In the end it is approximately the same as the original drawing except that it is still not the same quality. Digital images never are.
Oh --- I was going to say that you might get better results outside if you shoot in the shade. The neat thing about sunlight is that it is best if non-directional and that's what you get in shade. Not deep shade ... but in a cast shadow. I've never had much luck with outdoor photography of my drawings, but Armin Mersmann, for instance, takes his photos outside and he gets what I think are spectacular results. Could be the sun is different in Germany ...